Requirements definition.
Customer, content, operational and integration needs to be documented before any platform is discussed.
Platform selection
We recommend the website or commerce platform from your requirements, not from a default preference. The recommendation comes with its reasoning in writing, so you can interrogate it before you commit to it.
Scroll↓
In brief
We provide website platform selection services from Melbourne for established businesses across Australia. We evaluate platforms against customer, content, operational and integration requirements. Our platform-led builds are documented in case studies on this website. Platforms we assess and build on include WordPress, Shopify, BigCommerce, Adobe Commerce, Drupal and Contentful.
The service
The platform determines what your team can publish, what your systems can connect to and what the next five years of change will cost. We treat the decision with the weight it carries, and we put the reasoning where you can see it.
What we do
Requirements, evaluation and recommendation on one program, delivered by one accountable Melbourne team.
Customer, content, operational and integration needs to be documented before any platform is discussed.
Candidate platforms assessed against your requirements, with the trade-offs made explicit.
Licensing, hosting, build and running costs considered across the life of the platform, not just year one.
How each candidate connects to your CRM, ERP and operational systems, verified rather than assumed.
Publishing workflows tested against the people who will actually run the website daily.
A written recommendation with its reasoning, and the path from decision to build.
The evaluation ground
We work across WordPress, Shopify, WooCommerce and BigCommerce through to enterprise and composable ecosystems, and we hold partner credentials on several of them. The recommendation is driven by your requirements. It is never driven by what we would prefer to build.
WordPress and WooCommerce where control, content depth and flexibility lead the requirements.
Shopify and BigCommerce where trading operations and channel growth lead the requirements.
Composable and enterprise platforms where scale, governance and integration depth lead.
Why it matters
Every future website decision is made inside the platform you choose now. The right one keeps options open.
A whole-of-life cost view stops the licensing and rebuild surprises that arrive in year two.
A platform matched to your team turns the website into a tool rather than a ticket queue.
Integration capability verified up front, so the website joins the business instead of orbiting it.
New sections, markets and channels added on the platform, not despite it.
An informed decision keeps you in control of the relationship with every vendor involved.
Written reasoning that stands up to the board, the auditor and the next digital manager.
Quality
The recommendation is only as good as the reasoning behind it, so the reasoning is part of the deliverable.
Every requirement traced to a business need, and every platform scored against them.
What each candidate does well and where it will fight you, stated plainly.
Licensing, build, hosting and running costs projected across the platform's life.
Connection paths to your systems checked against documentation and experience, not marketing.
Publishing workflows assessed against the people who will use them.
The recommendation follows the requirements, and the reasoning is yours to keep either way.
Talk to us
A short, no obligation conversation about where the website is now and what it should do next.
The selection sequence
Requirements come before candidates, and candidates before the recommendation, so the decision is built rather than guessed.
Customer, content, operational and integration requirements documented and agreed first.
Shortlisted platforms scored against the requirements, with trade-offs and costs made explicit.
A written recommendation with its reasoning, and the path from decision to build.
The approach
Platform selection can run inside a discovery program or stand alone ahead of a build, ours or another team's.
Business objectives, audiences and the jobs the website must do, confirmed with the people who own them.
Current platform, content and systems audited for what carries forward and what blocks.
Evaluation order agreed by dependency and impact, with owners and checkpoints written down.
Requirements, scoring and cost projections produced in agreed cycles, reviewed as they land.
The recommendation verified as requirements-led, explicit and defensible against the agreed standards.
Findings from the build fed back into the reasoning, so the decision record stays true in use.
Answers
No. The recommendation follows your requirements, and different requirements genuinely produce different answers across our client base.
We hold partner credentials on several platforms, and the recommendation is driven by your requirements rather than by any partnership.
Often, yes. If the current platform meets the requirements, the honest recommendation is to keep it and spend the budget where it moves results.
Then the evaluation either confirms the choice with evidence or surfaces the risks while they are still cheap to act on.
No. The reasoning is documented to stand on its own, and it is yours to keep whichever team builds.
Access to the current website and analytics, the systems in scope, and the people who own content, operations and budget.
PROOF ON THIS PAGE
Nostra Homes
Website design and development that lifted traffic 245% and leads 424%.
Read more →
Friterie
Website design and development introducing a Belgian style fry house before opening day.
Read more →
Evoca Health
Website design and development guiding women to a welcoming GP clinic near them.
Read more →
Start a conversation
Weighing a replatform, starting fresh or stuck between candidates? Tell us what the website needs to achieve, and we will help identify the appropriate next step.